Live now — free to watch

Real people. Real positions. Watch it unfold.

Pick a topic, watch two debaters argue opposing sides in real time, no account needed. When you're ready to step on stage, sign up and pick your side.

Create free account Browse debates

Debates

Choose a side. Make your case. Live, or by turns.

On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Allow it, AI is just a new creative tool
0 waiting on Side 2 — Ban it, it devalues human creativity and labor

Should AI-generated work compete with human work?

Art contests, journalism, music charts, and writing awards are all being flooded with AI submissions. Is this progress or theft?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — UBI is essential for the AI era
0 waiting on Side 2 — UBI destroys work incentive and the economy

UBI for everyone?

As automation replaces jobs, some countries are piloting a guaranteed monthly payment for every adult, no strings attached. Lifeline or disaster?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Ban it, protect kids from harm
0 waiting on Side 2 — Parents decide, not the government

Ban social media for under-16s?

Australia already did it. Studies link teen social media use to anxiety and depression, but kids say it's their lifeline. Who decides?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Office is better for culture, mentorship, and output
0 waiting on Side 2 — Remote work is more productive and more humane

Should companies force employees back to the office?

Five years after COVID, CEOs want everyone back at their desks. Workers are quitting over it. Who is right?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Scale nuclear aggressively, it's the only realistic clean baseload
0 waiting on Side 2 — Too risky, too expensive, invest in renewables instead

Is nuclear the answer to climate change?

Zero carbon, massive output, but also Chernobyl and Fukushima in public memory. Should we build more reactors or shut them down?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Ban them, they are a public hazard
0 waiting on Side 2 — Keep them, they solve real mobility problems

Ban shared e-scooters from city streets?

Great for the last kilometre, terrible for pedestrians getting hit on sidewalks. Paris banned them.

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Crypto is the future of money
0 waiting on Side 2 — Crypto is a speculative bubble that will crash

Future of money or biggest bubble in history?

Bitcoin swings between record highs and deep crashes, governments keep cracking down, and retail investors keep getting wrecked. Which side of history are we on?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Keep it mandatory, security and social cohesion depend on it
0 waiting on Side 2 — Move to a professional volunteer army, like the US and UK

Should Israel move to a voluntary military?

Most Western democracies dropped conscription decades ago. Israel's security situation is unique, but is up to 3 years of forced service still the right model?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Tax it, the climate cost is real and urgent
0 waiting on Side 2 — Hands off my plate, this is personal choice

Should governments tax meat to cut consumption?

Livestock produce 14.5% of global greenhouse emissions. Some economists want a "sin tax" on meat like we have on cigarettes. Climate necessity or nanny state?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes, productivity and wellbeing both improve
0 waiting on Side 2 — No, global competitiveness will collapse

Should the standard workweek drop to 4 days?

Iceland and the UK ran large trials, and Belgium gave workers the legal right to a compressed 4-day week. Workers loved it, productivity mostly held up. So why isn't everyone doing it?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes, voting is a civic duty and should be required
0 waiting on Side 2 — No, voting should remain a free and personal choice

Should voting be mandatory for all citizens?

Australia has compulsory voting with fines for non-voters. Turnout hits 90%+. Should democracies worldwide make voting a legal obligation, or does freedom include the right to stay home?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Legalise it — regulate, tax, and reduce harm
0 waiting on Side 2 — Keep them illegal — legalisation increases addiction and social harm

Should recreational drugs be fully legalised?

Portugal decriminalised all drugs in 2001 and saw overdose deaths fall sharply in the following years. Canada and several US states legalised cannabis. Should governments take the next step and fully legalise recreational drugs?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Private companies drive innovation faster and cheaper
0 waiting on Side 2 — Space is too important to be left to profit-driven corporations

Should space exploration be privately funded?

SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic are racing to Mars and beyond. Should humanity's biggest frontier be led by billionaires with profit motives, or should governments keep control of space?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes — uniforms promote equality and reduce distractions
0 waiting on Side 2 — No — let kids express themselves freely

Should school uniforms be mandatory?

Proponents say uniforms reduce bullying, cut costs, and improve focus. Critics argue they suppress individuality and self-expression. The debate rages in schools from the UK to the US to Japan.

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Ban them — phones wreck concentration and mental health
0 waiting on Side 2 — Keep them — phones are tools for safety and modern learning

Should smartphones be banned in schools?

France banned phones in schools in 2018. The UK and many US states are following. Research shows phones hurt focus and fuel anxiety. But are they also vital safety tools and learning resources?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Allow it — eradicating disease is a moral imperative
0 waiting on Side 2 — Ban it — playing with human genetics is too dangerous

Should gene editing in humans be allowed?

CRISPR technology can eliminate hereditary diseases — but also engineer designer babies. A Chinese scientist already created gene-edited human embryos. Should we embrace or ban human germline editing?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Abolish it — the state should never take a life
0 waiting on Side 2 — Keep it — some crimes deserve the ultimate punishment

Should the death penalty be abolished worldwide?

About 55 countries still have the death penalty. Amnesty International calls it a violation of human rights. Supporters say it delivers justice for the worst crimes. Is the death penalty ever justified?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Free for all — education is a right, not a privilege
0 waiting on Side 2 — Graduates should pay — taxpayers shouldn't fund others' careers

Should higher education be free for everyone?

Germany, Norway, and Finland offer free university. The US and UK saddle students with decades of debt. Is a university degree a public good that society should fund, or a personal investment?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes — platforms profit from harm and must be accountable
0 waiting on Side 2 — No — liability would kill free speech and open platforms

Should social media companies be held liable for harmful content?

Misinformation, hate speech, and self-harm content flood platforms daily. Section 230 protects US tech giants from lawsuits. Should platforms face legal consequences for what their algorithms amplify?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Cap it — extreme wealth is a societal failure, not a success
0 waiting on Side 2 — No cap — wealth limits punish success and stifle ambition

Should there be a global cap on personal wealth?

The world's 10 richest men own more than the bottom 3.1 billion people combined. Some economists propose a billionaire cap or 100% tax above a threshold. Would it fix inequality or crush innovation?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — pro-choice
0 waiting on Side 2 — pro-life

Should abortion be available to everyone?

Should abortion be legal and accessible, and if so, up to what point? Where should the law draw the line?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes, evil disproves such a God
0 waiting on Side 2 — No, evil is compatible with God

Does the existence of evil disprove an all-powerful, good God?

If God is all-powerful and all-good, why does evil exist? Could God simply stop it, or is evil compatible with free will and a greater plan?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Funny, harmless comedy
0 waiting on Side 2 — Too dark or violent for kids

Is SMG4 harmless comedy or too dark for younger viewers?

SMG4 started in 2011 as Super Mario 64 blooper videos and grew into a meme-heavy comedy series with dramatic story arcs. Most of the violence is slapstick, but some episodes include censored swearing, darker plots, and moderate violence. Is it fun for all ages, or should younger viewers skip it?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes, MAGA is patriotic
0 waiting on Side 2 — No, MAGA is not patriotic

Is being MAGA patriotic?

Supporters see MAGA as putting America and its citizens first; critics see it as undermining democratic norms and institutions. Is it patriotism or not?

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — Yes, there are only two genders
0 waiting on Side 2 — No, there are more than two genders

Are there only two genders?

Gender is a topic that has been debated for years. Some people believe there are only two genders, while others believe gender can include more than two identities. What do you think? Debate the topic using reasoning, evidence, and respect for the other side.

Enter chamber
On stage
0 waiting on Side 1 — God exists
0 waiting on Side 2 — God does not exist

Is there a God?

Believers point to faith, meaning and the origin of the universe; skeptics point to the lack of evidence. Which side holds up better?

Enter chamber

Want to propose a topic or join a side?

Create a free account — takes 20 seconds. You'll be able to argue any topic and propose new ones.

Sign up to debate